Some people think that obesity largely stems from a lack of willpower - either eating too much food, or eating the wrong kind of food. While this perspective may be valid in some cases, it's simply not true much of the time. I have seen many morbidly obese patients who, when questioned about their diet, claim to eat only modest portions of what most people would call "healthy" food. Many of them have tried every diet under the sun, and yet to their utter frustration, they remain obese. Seen within a traditional medical perspective, this appears to make no sense, and so either all of these people are lying about what they eat, or the traditional medical perspective is broken, or at least incomplete. I am for the latter option.
Most standard definitions of health focus on the absence of disease (6). Although this is indeed a necessary condition for health, it is not sufficient. Since a thing cannot be defined by the absence of something else, health can no more be defined by the absence of disease than the sun can be defined by the absence of darkness. A more specific definition is required.
There have been many attempts to solve the obesity problem through changes in diet. Traditionally, a diet refers to either restriction (reducing how much is eaten) or special kinds of food (changing what is eaten), or both, usually in order to lose weight (14). The familiar, dogmatic medical advice regarding how much is eaten - "eat regular meals but limit portion size" - is difficult to sustain and is rarely successful, with perhaps the most notable exception seen in Okinawa Island, Japan where people traditionally adhered to the Confucian practice of Hara Hachi Bu which advises eating to 80% full (15). The usual medical advice regarding what is eaten is also familiar to most people - usually something along the lines of "eat regular meals but less sugar and more vegetables and fiber" - and many have taken this further to advocate one of the many different commercial diets available, with some of the popular ones listed below (16).
Fortunately, there is a simple approach to addressing chronic nutrient intake and restoring the balance between catabolism and anabolism, called intermittent fasting, a way of eating that cycles between periods of fasting (catabolism) and eating (anabolism). There's more evidence in support of intermittent fasting than any of the other strategies mentioned above, and it's easier to implement too.
For most people, a healthy diet does not require a religious adherence to restricting calorie intake, nor does it require scrupulous attention to the foods that are eaten. Health is simpler than that - it's about timing meals appropriately so as to maintain the balance between catabolism and anabolism such that rather than worrying about how much you eat and what you eat, all you really have to pay attention to is when you eat. Your body will do the rest. In the considered analysis, intermittent fasting is the single best strategy for addressing chronic nutrient intake and obesity in the western world today, hands down.
References
Proudly powered by Weebly